Saturday, September 6, 2008

Week 01 - Picks of the Week

Spread Picks:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet % Bet Amt
1 SEA @ BUF +1 27% $7.50
2 TB @ NO +3 25% $7.50
3 BAL v. CIN +1.5 25% $7.50
4 ARI @ SF -2.5 23% $7.50
5 DEN @ OAK -3

6 HOU @ PIT +6.5

7 PHI v. STL -7.5

8 CAR @ SD +9

9 JAC @ TEN -3

10 CHI @ IND +9.5

11 DET @ ATL -3

12 WAS @ NYG +4.5

13 KC @ NE +16.5

14 MIN @ GB +2.5

15 NYJ @ MIA -3

16 CLE v. DAL +6


Totals: Bets: $30.00





Moneyline Picks:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet % Bet Amt
1 PHI v. STL -340 29% $6.67
2 TB @ NO +145 26% $6.11
3 ARI @ SF -145 24% $5.55
4 DEN @ OAK -150 21% $5.00
5 JAC @ TEN -150

6 DET @ ATL -165

7 NYJ @ MIA -160

8 GB v. MIN -140

9 DAL @ CLE -250

10 NYG v. WAS -220

11 PIT v. HOU -280

12 SD v. CAR -450

13 IND v. CHI -500

14




15




16





Totals: Bets: $23.33




These lines are as of 9/4, when I placed the bets.

Gamblebox loves a nice even spread this week, no huge favorites. I do like that it seemed to pick a lot of "cusp" type games, games that have the potential to go either way. I also agree with Bill Simmons and Sal when they said the TB / NO game is a potential trap game. Public perception on NO is favorable, but TB is a strong team with an excellent ground game against a young, mediocre NO defense. It could be a great pick.

I'm less thrilled with SEA v BUF, though in truth, BUF is a cindarella playoff pick for a lot of pundits and the spread may be benefiting. SEA has a good defense and will force Trent Edwards to air it out, I think, something he's not as adept to do (versus J.P. Losman, that is). Lee Evans ends up suffering for it, since BUF has embraced a west coast style and limited Evans' ability to stretch the field. The wild card could be speacial teams, which favors BUF heavily. BUF has two of the top returners in the NFL in McGee and Parrish, plus an excellent coverage squad and kicker. Tight spread makes me nervous, but it's early in the season, so it could still go either way.

BAL makes me nervous, too, with Joe Flacco, but I'm guessing the defense will carry here (cross my fingers). I love the DEN moneyline pick, great odds and I think Cutler will have something to prove with Brandon Marshall suspended. Jamarcus Russell really isn't that smart, in the end, and despite a weak LB core at Denver, I think OAK will be hard pressed to score.

Otherwise, thank God it's football season again!

PS - Capper, oh Capper, Where art thou oh Capper?

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Week 01 - Gambling Power Ranks

Here they are, new and improved - the gambler power ranks. They combine three elements:

1.) Expected performance against an average team (based on the excellent work of Football Outsiders) - measure of the number of expected points per game to expect against an average opponent.

2.) Performance volatility - measures actual performance versus expected performance volatility, kicks in starting Week 2.

3.) Game value - measure of how "important" a game is for a particular team in terms of playoff implications.

By fusing these elements, we have a chart that basically highlights the best scoring predictable teams, with bonus going to teams playing in playoff implication games. Obviously in Week 1, playoff implications are a few weeks off, but much closer than you'd think. For instance, the difference between being 3-2 and 2-3 in terms of playoff implications amount to a stagger 100% (from a 33% chance of making playoffs at 2-3 historically to a 66% chance of making the playoffs at 3-2 historically - numbers from Football Outsiders).

So here are the rankings. My bets are in, as well, and I'll list them soon:

Power Ranks ▲▼
1 NE
2 PHI
3 GB
4 SD
5 MIN
6 IND
7 SEA
8 TB
9 JAC
10 DAL
11 PIT
12 NYG
13 BAL
14 CAR
15 HOU
16 DEN
17 NO
18 ARI
19 CHI
20 CIN
21 TEN
22 NYJ
23 WAS
24 CLE
25 BUF
26 KC
27 MIA
28 DET
29 OAK
30 STL
31 SF
32 ATL
* Excludes BYE week teams!

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Week 17 Revisited

Here's a taste of what the future holds:

A comparison between Week 17 old power ranks and new:

Power Ranks ▲▼
1 NE
2 IND
3 DAL
4 JAC ▲1
5 SD ▲2
6 TB
7 PIT ▲1
8 GB ▼4
9 SEA
10 PHI ▲1
11 MIN ▼1
12 CLE
13 TEN
14 WAS
15 CIN
16 NYG ▲2
17 NO
18 DEN ▼2
19 BUF
20 CHI ▲1
21 HOU ▼1
22 BAL
23 ARI
24 DET
25 KC
26 NYJ
27 CAR ▲1
28 ATL ▲1
29 MIA ▲1
30 OAK ▼3
31 STL
32 SF
* Excludes BYE week teams!

Plus, the new Game Value and Volatility ranks:

Rank GV Vol
1 CLE GB
2 MIN CIN
3 PHI PHI
4 TB WAS
5 TEN SEA
6 WAS JAC
7 NYG TEN
8 PIT NE
9 SD MIA
10 SEA ARI
11 ARI OAK
12 BUF MIN
13 DET IND
14 NO BAL
15 JAC DAL
16 ATL KC
17 BAL DET
18 CAR PIT
19 CHI STL
20 CIN DEN
21 DAL CAR
22 DEN HOU
23 GB CHI
24 HOU ATL
25 IND TB
26 KC SF
27 MIA SD
28 NE NYG
29 NYJ BUF
30 OAK NO
31 SF CLE
32 STL NYJ
* Excludes BYE week teams!

Note how Cleveland is playing in the most important game of the week (in terms of playoff implications, etc. historically), and they are the second most volatile team in the league (ranked 31st). A solid bet? I think not. More tweaks to come.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

It's That Time of Year...

I feel like the guy in that Office Max commercial, dancing through the aisles as happily buying "going back to school" gear.

Football season fast approaches, and the box and I have spent some very quality time together. Hot hot quality time. I thought I'd get a jump start, though I won't be ready for much commentary until closer to prime time in late August. Here are some changes to expect:

1.) No more "pure" financial measures.

The BOX is now BOX 3.0, a total upgraded version. I am currently starting a green hedge fund (see here for the gist, and here for more details) with a model I've worked on for 2 years, and I have a bunch of new tricks up my sleeves. I may revisit the Financials (alpha, beta, sharpe ratio) later this summer, but for now, they are a thing of the past. They have been replaced by new metrics, most importantly: Game Value, Performance Volatility, and Expected Performance. I'm combining a lot of the hedge fund volatility metrics and applying them here to performance (ie, point performance, performance vs. the spread, statistical field performance, performance against an average, etc.). Let's just say the database got much thicker.

Game Value - the statistically based game value based team performance and record.

Performance Volatility - the volatility of a teams week to week performance statistically on multiple levels.

Expected Performance - a sort of futures derivative for football performance, looks at a combination of Vegas and statistical expected performance.

I'll go over it all in more detail as the season gets closer, suffice to say, I'm pretty stoked.

2.) I cracked the Holy Grail: 60% historical win rate.

It's legitimate. Whether it will hold up is another question, but back to back years of 60% performance using the new metrics. You might be asking, "How did you accomplish such a feat Mr. Genius?" It's a good question, but a key component was something obvious that I overlooked last season. I spent a good deal of time reviewing how many games to bet to maximize my win percentage, but I ignored the simple fact: all weeks are not created equal. GVal (Game Value) assigns realistic, statistically based value to upcoming games, similarly to Mark Myers' TIMP system but using a totally different data set. In fact, I based values on over 15 years of data (it's been a busy summer) to come up with real game values that are organic. I initially resisted what GVal seemed to suggest; don't bet on games that don't have value, even if it means betting on NO GAMES in a particular week! While this isn't much fun, espeically if it's more than one week of no betting in spread games in a row, it's definitely profitable. Limiting myself to the highest probability games as values shift means some weeks I could make 16 bets, others 2 bets, but only bets that have real value.

I haven't expanded the notion to moneyline, teasers, and parlays yet, but I still have many modifications to go before the season starts.

3.) No more wondering how much to bet.

While I still haven't devised a way to have the BOX suggest a minimum bet, I have figured out how to enter a minimum (ie, $5 at my online "broker"), and the BOX does the rest. I plan on adding the "Doubler" again in a few test cases, but the allocations now act more like stock portfolios than football betting. Box 2.0 devised allocations as well, but needed multiple variables each week, like how much to bet and how much the minimum is every week. Now, the BOX says "Bet this much assuming a minimum of X".

4.) The spread/juice stock ticker.

One of the last things Vegas wants, in sharp contrast to equity markets, is real time data. Betting arbitrage would be a disaster. Imagine a system where Vegas sets the line of NE v. KC at NE -10, -125. Money comes pouring in for NE - bettors think the spread is too low, for whatever reason. Suddenly, in order to compensate for this, Vegas needs to a.) raise the spread, b.) raise the vig, or c.) both so they don't end up on the tremendous losing end of this game. So within a day, the new line is NE -15.5, -115. Imagine if, along the way, you had a ticker giving you the line. As you saw the line pump up, you realized - hey, I should get in on the ground floor here - and you place a bet at NE -12, -120. When the line jumps above 14, you think maybe KC has a chance here, and because it's happening in real time, you can lock in a bet at KC +14.5, +110, hedging yourself on the upside. But real time markets mean real time money and real time hedging, all of which are bad for Vegas.

So in lieu of Vegas, the BOX now takes multiple ticks in the "market". I haven't tested this yet, as I lack the back data (it's impossible to get in usable form), it's a step forward in actual betting arbitrage. So watch for this later this season, it could prove awesome.

So that's the scoop. I don't imagine I'll be posting much again until preseason in mid/late August, but it's fast approaching! Get psyched!

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Week 19 - Matty Lives!

Whew!

Matty boy! I thought you might have hit a snow bank or something, I haven't heard from you since before the holidays....

Anyway, I am most definitely pissed I didn't actually post my bets for the wild card weekend, I intended to spend my last $10 all in on a 4-team parlay which went 3-0-1 and would have paid off $60. Sadly I remain with only $10, and figure I should repeat the process this week. The spreads are huge so it's a tough call. But right now I like all the dogs to cover, possibly with the exception of GB and NE, who will probably destroy SEA and JAX, respectively.

It's been an awesome year 1 for us here at Mental Handicap, and this post-season and offseason should be fun. My goal is to research my win % on the various styles of betting, perfect the Wave Theory and determine the optimum betting system and stick with it in year 2. In addition, Matty and I will have to figure out a way to rank the teams in the offseason to get the 2008 season ready to go in Week 1. I have a feeling the box will struggle in the beginning so look for The Mad Capper to jump out to an early lead.

Happy New Year everyone!

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

End of Season Review

So it's been a while, and after placing some ludicrous but fun bets on Week 17 (and getting my ass handed to me in the process), I've abstained from all post season betting. Why? Because a.) I have zero historical data on which to base my guesses, and b.) anything can happen. I can pretty much guess that the Box would pick almost every underdog, too, but I still have no way to no. I have created no postseason module. That may be something to start for next season.

Overall, I would have to say it was a successful trial year. I lost a marginal amount of cash in what amounted to an oddly disproportionate favorite-covering year, so assuming over time things revert to the mean (where underdogs have a very slight advantage), I feel like I'm on the right track. The Box is now able to pick based on "cost per bet", a feature added very late in the season and perfected in Week 15 or 16, so my expectations will be high next year for some serious cash flow.

I will post results here in the morning, but for now, I wanted to bid a farewell to anyone who read this regularly - I assume me and the Capper, and maybe occasionally my wife - and I look forward to next season. Keep us on the RSS feeds, we may post a bit over the post season and off season just as updates happen and the betting styles are honed. With a few seasons data under my belt, it will be easier to run back tests and improve my stats hopefully. So check back for a full end of season review soon, for now, ta ta!

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Week 18 - Playoffs Change the Gambling Game

Well I'm back, the holidays took week 17 away from me, but it's just in time for playoffs...

So what to make of this?

There are only 4 games per week in the wild card and divisional rounds, then 2 games in the conference finals, and finally the superbowl... All season long we've been picking our favorite games, but now our choices dwindle from 16 games down to 4, and in theory, these games should be harder to call. Let's take a look at the wild card round:

jax -2 at PIT
SEA -4 vs was
TB -2.5 vs nyg
SD -9 vs ten

PIT is a home 'dog playing a team that kicked their butts already this year before PIT lost Willie Parker. I agre with Vegas here, and think JAX wins this game. Same goes for SD vs TEN, but in this game the spread is a whopping 9 points. Will TEN get beat that badly?

The SEA and TB games are more toss-ups, with the 'dogs in both games playing their best football recently, while the favorites are home and kind of eased into the playoffs. My gut says WAS finally hits the wall and loses the game and the spread to SEA , and TB pulls out a 1 or 2 point win, making me pick the Giants plus points.

What says the box?