Wednesday, October 1, 2008

Week 04 - Not the Prettiest Girl

Well, it wasn't the prettiest of weeks. A lot of uncalculated upsets, but at this point in the season, the box is just starting to really flesh out who the winners are. I also added another layer of volatility measurements (this time in terms of pure statistics against the average rather than points/spread ratios), and my back data seems to improve by it. So expect some new things potentially, including more games bet, for the coming weeks. That said, as the cash gets low, the bet sizes drop too. Sigh.

Here are the results:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet % Bet Amt W/L Payout
1 GB @ TB +1 18% $17.38 L $0.00
2 ARI @ NYJ +1.5 18% $17.29 L $0.00
3 BAL @ PIT +5 17% $16.63 W $32.48
4 ATL @ CAR +6.5 17% $16.39 L $0.00
5 SF @ NO +5 16% $15.95 L $0.00
6 TEN v. MIN -3 15% $14.59 W $27.28

and

Rank Pick Vs ML Bet % Bet Amt W/L Payout
1 BUF @ STL -360 39% $13.94 W $17.81
2 ATL @ CAR +240 31% $11.17 L $0.00
3 BAL @ PIT +190 29% $10.39 L $0.00

So GB not only killed me, but I can't figure them out. Is it possible TB is far better than expected?

I'll try to post the new rankings today, but it likely won't get done until tomorrow, as this is a busy week. More to come, stay tuned.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Week 04 - The Box's Best Bets

Here they are, placed with cheap juice:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet % Bet Amt
1 GB @ TB +1 18% $17.38
2 ARI @ NYJ +1.5 18% $17.29
3 BAL @ PIT +5 17% $16.63
4 ATL @ CAR +6.5 17% $16.39
5 SF @ NO +5 16% $15.95
6 TEN v. MIN -3 15% $14.59

and...

Rank Pick Vs ML Bet % Bet Amt
1 BUF @ STL -360 39% $13.94
2 ATL @ CAR +240 31% $11.17
3 BAL @ PIT +190 29% $10.39

for totals of:

Start Value
$247.66
Net of +/-
$0.00
Total Bank
$247.66
Bets Placed
$133.74

Very sexy. I'm glad I waited to get those extra games in, even if it cost me a couple of points on the spread. I'm going to run some teaser tests again, see if I can't break the teaser code and make it worth the bet. For now, hoping for a decent week to make up for last week.

Friday, September 26, 2008

"The Sports Guy" Hilarious Moment of the Week

Week 4's gem from Bill Simmons, referring to the TN v MIN game:

..."They (TN) have the league's best defense, and if you don't believe me, you will believe me this Sunday after they do everything short of actually having sex with Gus Frerotte."

It's gold Jerry, gold!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Back on the Horse - Week 4 Madcapping

Sorry I've been AWOL this week, the job that actually pays had me pretty tied up. So after last week's rotten performance, it's back on the horse this week. I'm very tempted to find two or three bets I like most and screw diversification. With the unpredictability of the NFL, this may actually work out better. Let's take a look at the matchups:


GB(+1) @ TB
...So let me get this straight: GB loses to DAllas like everyone else and they are 'dogs against the Bucs? Al Harris is out for a while, and TB beat CHI in OT last week, bu t I just don't see it. GB was a force in Weeks 1-3, and they still are.

Madcapping: GB 23 - TB 19
Confidence: 80%


ARI(+1.5) @ NYJ
...I need to resist the urge to outsmart myself here. Reality is both these teams are unreliable, and anything could happen. Personally I like the Jets. They need the win more, and they are home against a team from the West. An often overlooked fact is that teams that travel cross country have a terrible record. Travel time and jet lag matter.

Madcapping: ARI 20 - NYJ 23
Confidence: 60%


ATL (+7)@ CAR
...CAR lost its first game last week at MIN, and I am betting they are out for blood this week. ATL is 2-1, but their wins are against KC and DET. I love CAR to win this game, but the spread is high enough to raise concerns. The Moneyline and Teaser Bets should make this game more worthwhile.

Madcapping: ATL 9 - CAR 19
Confidence: 70%

SF(+5.5) @ NO
...Very very interesting matchup. Normally I would say NO is going to blow out SF due to their offensive power, but #1 receiver Colston is out injured, as is TE Shockey. McCallister hasn't played yet due to injuries either. I've been touting the new SF QB O'Sullivan, for a couple weeks now, so it may just be time to put my money where my mouth is.

Madcapping: SF 20 - NO 19
Confidence: 70%


TEN(-3) v. MIN

...Well MIN beat CAR last week and completely screwed me, so the question is will they beat arguably the AFC's toughest team on their turf? I think not. TN's Defense has proven itself to be stout, and I don't see MIN having enough firepower to score many points. TEN's ground game has been very effective, so I see this as a ball-control low scoring game. The TEN-3 spread makes this a difficult bet, though. I recommend staying away.

Madcapping: TN 14 - MIN 13
Confidence: NONE.


BUF(-8) @ STL

...BUF is getting some serious credibility now, and against a terrible STL team this spread is certainly justifiable, but I just don't like betting on spreads this high. BUF in a teaser makes a lot of sense, so that's my call.

Madcapping: BUF 24 - STL 10
Confidence: 90% (6 point Teaser)


DEN(-10) @ KC
...DEN's offense has been damn impressive, and KC has looked awful. KC is going back to Huard, which should keep this game closer than it otherwise would be, they are home in Arrowhead, and DEN hasn't shown much defensively. I like Denver to cover, but it's risky. Could be a good Teaser option, though.

Madcapping: DEN 30 - KC 20
Confidence: 80% (6 point Teaser)


WAS(+11) @ DAL
...Betting against DAL this year is like betting against NE. They are gonna get huge spreads, but they are absolutely capable of blowing them up. Other than a Teaser, I'd stay away.

Madcapping: WAS 17 - DAL 27
Confidence: 80% (6 point Teaser)


CLE(+3.5) @ CIN
...I think this game is a huge overreaction to CLE's losses to 3 tough teams and Cincy's playing NYG tough last week. The browns have cost me 3 weeks in a row, but I am tupid enough to stick with them one more week. I'd take the moneyline bet here and run.

Madcapping: CLE 24 - CIN 20
Confidence: 70%


OAK(+9) v. SD
...So is Kiffin fired or not? It doesn't matter. This game is a matter of how badly will SD win. I like them to cover and I like them in a Teaser.

Madcapping: SD 30 - OAK 9
Confidence: 80%


JAC (-7.5)
v. HOU
...JAC got off to a rocky start with a banged up interior O-Line, but beat IND last week. HOU has not looked good offensively, so I think Vegas has set a very reasonable spread here. Could be another good Teaser Bet.

Madcapping: JAC 22 - HOU 14
Confidence: 80%




















































Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Week 04 - Preliminary Picks

The moneylines are in, a bunch of games are waiting on injury reports, but here are preliminary picks:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet %
1 GB @ TB +1 21%
2 ARI @ NYJ +1.5 21%
3 ATL @ CAR +7 20%
4 SF @ NO +5.5 19%
5 TEN v. MIN -3 18%
6 BUF @ STL -8
7 DEN @ KC -10
8 WAS @ DAL +11
9 CLE @ CIN +3.5
10 OAK v. SD +9
11 JAC v. HOU -7.5

and ML:

Rank Pick Vs ML Bet %
1 BUF @ STL -360 40%
2 ATL @ CAR +260 31%
3 SF @ NO +200 29%
4 TEN v. MIN -160
5 DEN @ KC -460
6 CIN v. CLE -190
7 JAC v. HOU -350
8 SD @ OAK -350
9 DAL v. WAS -500


Bets I Love:
I love taking SF of NO surprisingly. I think NO secondary is suspect, they'll stack the line against Gore, and it'll be a much closer game than it seems. The GB pick seems like a trap to me, especially now that Al Harris is done for the season. But I do like the ARI pick over the Jets - Favre finally showed his true colors last week. He's like a lost child with the Jets, and the wear and tear of NYC will hit him harder and harder if they keep losing.

Bets I Hate:
ATL over CAR is just not something I can get into. I think ATL has a shot here, but they're so volatile. Also, I hate taking BUF over STL, no matter how sure a thing it seems. Last week, NE/MIA was just a total waste, considering my payout on the $12 bet was $1.80. Cost benefit = terrible.

Bets I Wish The Box Took:
CLE over CIN. I think Derek Andersen needs to fear for his job. Every game. I bet he plays twice as well. Last season he was constantly concerned that Quinn was a possiblity, no matter how well he played. I think CLE will run rampant, and people are overreacting to CIN's performance against the Giants last week.

Week 04 - This Could Be Awesome

I love some of the opportunities this week, I'm expecting a week rife with upsets and sweet moneyline love. There are a few OFF games, and Sportsbook has no lines for the PIT game (Willie Parker's out) and the PHI game (Westbrook/McNabb are questionable or out).

So for today, I'm going to give you power ranks. The power ranks are designed to include ONLY NON BYE WEEK TEAMS. It gives you the ranks of teams available for betting only, so no OFF teams either. What with them being the gambling power ranks, that makes sense. Tomorrow hopefully will settle some of the OFF ridiculosity (yeah, new word - I'm a linguist).

Power Ranks ▲▼
1 TEN ▲9
2 DAL ▲2
3 BUF ▲8
4 DEN ▲1
5 ATL ▲16
6 GB ▼3
7 SD ▼1
8 TB ▼6
9 MIN ▼8
10 ARI ▼2
11 SF ▲9
12 OAK ▲6
13 WAS ▲6
14 NO ▼5
15 CAR ▼8
16 NYJ ▼4
17 JAC
18 CLE ▼4
19 CIN ▼4
20 HOU ▼7
21 KC ▼5
22 STL

And the volatility/game value ranks are here:

Rank GV Vol
1 ARI MIN
2 ATL CLE
3 CAR DEN
4 DEN NO
5 GB TB
6 SD NYJ
7 SF DAL
8 TB TEN
9 WAS KC
10 BUF ARI
11 DAL OAK
12 TEN CAR
13 HOU SD
14 JAC HOU
15 MIN BUF
16 NO GB
17 NYJ SF
18 OAK ATL
19 CIN CIN
20 CLE JAC
21 KC WAS
22 STL STL

Surprise surprise, STL is the bottom of every rank. More importantly, look at BUF's volatility. BUF makes me nervous - everyone is very high on them, the box included, but they have yet to truly prove themselves.

More to come tomorrow...

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Week 03 - Losses All Around

So, for some reason (I spent half the day trying to figure it out), my numbers were wrong. Not the win/loss, but the cash tracking. It turns out I got no action on a bet I thought there was action on, making my system very confused. Which means my system last week just looked wrong - I was actually up way more than I thought I was. And it also means this week was much worse than I thought, too. But it pretty much evened out, still up for the year, so here are the lovely results from Week 3's bets:

Rank Pick Vs Spd Bet % Bet Amt W/L Payout
1 TB @ CHI +3 26% $24.80 W $48.42
2 BAL v. CLE -2 25% $23.75 W $46.37
3 GB v. DAL +3 24% $23.02 L $0.00
4 ARI @ WAS +3 24% $22.66 L $0.00

and...

Rank Pick Vs ML Bet % Bet Amt W/L Payout
1 NE v. MIA -800 30% $12.01 L $0.00
2 ARI @ WAS +150 27% $10.56 L $0.00
3 TB @ CHI +135 24% $9.28 W $21.80
4 KC @ ATL +210 19% $7.61 L $0.00

For totals of...

Start Value
$264.75
Net of +/-
$0.00
Total Bank
$264.75
Bets Placed
$133.69
Bet Income
-$17.10
Ending Bank
$247.66
Total Return
-6.46%

Where the moneyline kept me afloat in week 1, it kicked my ass in week 3. NE blew up (could be a long year, but I like seeing lots of NE dogs coming up, which means lots of lopsided opportunity), ARI just got beat, and KC... well, they're KC. The spreads were close, especially considering ARI and GB could have almost gone either way (sort of). But I was up about 55 cents on spread bets this week.

The box is doing a nice job so far this year picking some of the least volatile games overall. And now that we're getting to week 4, we'll start to see game value play a bigger role (how a game's win or loss has eventual playoff implications, and how important it is to win that game). All in all, I can't complain, despite the mixed week.

Hopefully I'll have a bit more time this week to post, I just got a new job (woot!) so I'll take a while to settle into my rhythm. Suffice to say, betting will still play a big part.