Power Ranks | ▲▼ | %FromTop | W/L/T | ATS | |
1 | NYG | 0% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 | |
2 | MIN | 16% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 | |
3 | BAL | ▲5 | 25% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 3 - 0 - 0 |
4 | JAC | ▲3 | 28% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
5 | NO | ▲4 | 33% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 3 - 0 - 0 |
6 | DAL | ▼3 | 40% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
7 | DEN | ▲15 | 42% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 3 - 0 - 0 |
8 | IND | ▼4 | 43% | OFF | OFF |
9 | GB | ▲8 | 45% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
10 | NYJ | ▲11 | 53% | 3 - 0 - 0 | 3 - 0 - 0 |
11 | SEA | ▼1 | 54% | OFF | OFF |
12 | WAS | ▼6 | 57% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
13 | PIT | ▼8 | 57% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 0 - 3 - 0 |
14 | ATL | ▼1 | 58% | OFF | OFF |
15 | NE | ▲13 | 58% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
16 | CAR | ▲3 | 60% | OFF | OFF |
17 | CIN | ▲1 | 60% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
18 | HOU | ▲11 | 61% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
19 | BUF | ▲12 | 61% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
20 | ARI | ▲3 | 62% | OFF | OFF |
21 | SD | ▼10 | 64% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
22 | CHI | ▼7 | 64% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
23 | KC | ▲9 | 64% | 0 - 2 - 0 | 0 - 2 - 0 |
24 | TEN | ▲1 | 64% | 0 - 3 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
25 | SF | ▲1 | 64% | 2 - 1 - 0 | 3 - 0 - 0 |
26 | MIA | ▲1 | 66% | 0 - 3 - 0 | 0 - 3 - 0 |
27 | OAK | ▼3 | 67% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 2 - 1 - 0 |
28 | TB | ▼8 | 68% | 0 - 3 - 0 | 0 - 3 - 0 |
29 | PHI | ▲1 | 70% | OFF | OFF |
30 | STL | ▼16 | 71% | 0 - 3 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
31 | DET | ▼15 | 74% | 1 - 2 - 0 | 1 - 2 - 0 |
32 | CLE | ▼20 | 77% | 0 - 3 - 0 | 0 - 3 - 0 |
* Excludes BYE week teams! | |||||
A new feature:
Rank | Top Movers | Move & Dir |
1 | CLE | D20 |
2 | STL | D16 |
3 | DEN | U15 |
4 | DET | D15 |
5 | NE | U13 |
JAC, SEA, and WAS are mysteries to me. JAC is not top 5 in my mind, though they have tangled with IND, ARI, and HOU - all quality teams. SEA has been hit by CHI and SF, teams on the rise, and they beat up STL as they should have. But WAS? What the fuck? WAS was beat by DET, played STL close, and got beat up by NYG... they're not even contenders, but they're still in the top 12. Sounds suspect. We shall see.
No comments:
Post a Comment