Rank | Pick | Vs | Spd | Bet % |
1 | TB | @ CHI | +3 | 26% |
2 | BAL | v. CLE | -2 | 25% |
3 | GB | v. DAL | +3 | 24% |
4 | ARI | @ WAS | +3 | 24% |
5 | KC | @ ATL | +5.5 | |
6 | NO | @ DEN | +5.5 | |
7 | OAK | @ BUF | +9.5 | |
8 | JAC | @ IND | +5.5 | |
9 | DET | @ SF | +4 | |
10 | HOU | @ TEN | +5 | |
11 | PHI | v. PIT | -3 | |
12 | CIN | @ NYG | +13.5 | |
13 | NYJ | @ SD | +9 | |
14 | CAR | @ MIN | +3.5 | |
15 | MIA | @ NE | +12.5 | |
16 | SEA | v. STL | -9.5 |
and ML:
Rank | Pick | Vs | ML | Bet % |
1 | NE | v. MIA | -800 | 30% |
2 | ARI | @ WAS | +150 | 27% |
3 | TB | @ CHI | +130 | 25% |
4 | KC | @ ATL | +190 | 18% |
5 | GB | v. DAL | +145 | |
6 | SEA | v. STL | -480 | |
7 | BAL | v. CLE | -140 | |
8 | PHI | v. PIT | -190 | |
9 | MIN | v. CAR | -200 | |
10 | TEN | v. HOU | -220 | |
11 | SF | v. DET | -200 | |
12 | DEN | v. NO | -230 | |
13 | IND | v. JAC | -230 | |
14 | SD | v. NYJ | -430 | |
15 | NYG | v. CIN | -850 | |
16 | BUF | v. OAK | -480 |
That's right, the box is so compelled by New England, it's willing to take a totally worthless payout. And the box highly evaluates payouts - not most other worthless payouts are at the bottom. I'm unclear as to why this is so convicted, but meh - who am I to argue.
I know I have abandoned the parlay for the most part, but I've decided to include a suggested Teaser every week based on the box's historical win percentages. Here's the first one:
TB +9, BAL +4, ARI +9, and KC +11.5. My number 1, 2, 4, and 5 picks have historically done really well. Have yet to figure out what the deal is with that number 3 pick, but it's worth running the numbers to see how I do with these picks. Teasers tend to be so bad in the payouts that you're better off betting each game individually, but when in Rome...
No comments:
Post a Comment